Last month, the court ruled that a group of Uber drivers who sued an employment court were not independent contractors because their activities were “very tightly defined and controlled by Uber.” The judge mentioned the company’s control over rates and how it sets the contractual terms on which drivers perform their services. The lawsuit against Uber was first filed by Yaseen Aslam and James Farrar in 2016 when the two men were driving for Uber.
The decision marked a significant defeat for Uber in the UK, where it has come under pressure from labor activists and transport regulators. Uber has defended its controversial business model by treating its employees as independent contractors while, more recently, presenting the addition of new benefits as a middle ground of sorts.
As part of the ballot box measure, Uber continues to treat its drivers as independent contractors with a number of new benefits, including a minimum earnings guarantee based on ‘engaged time’ when a driver complies with a ride or delivery request, but not the time they spend. waiting for a performance. Uber and other gig companies have announced that they intend to pass similar laws in other states, as well as pursuing federal law in the United States to strengthen their approach.