SPAC Boom faces new SEC accounting crackdown threat

Photographer: Andrew Harrer / Bloomberg

US regulators are throwing another key into Wall Street’s SPAC machine by working hard on how accounting rules apply to a key element of blank check businesses.

The Securities and Exchange Commission outlines new ones guidelines that warrants issued to early investors in the deals may not be considered equity instruments and may instead be accounting liabilities. The move, previously reported by Bloomberg News, threatens to disrupt filings for new specialty acquisition companies until the issue is resolved.

The accounting considerations mark the SEC’s latest attempt to curb the white-hot SPAC market. For months, the regulator has been raising warning signs that investors are not being fully informed of potential risks associated with blank check companies, which are quoted on public stock exchanges to raise money to buy other entities.

See also: SEC warns SPACs Are not a way to get around securities laws

The SEC began contacting accountants last week with the warrant guidelines, according to people familiar with the matter. A pipeline of hundreds of filings for new SPACs could be affected, the people said, who asked not to be named because the talks were private.

“The SEC indicated that they will not declare registration statements effective unless a warrant issue is addressed,” said a client note from the accounting firm Marcum reviewed by Bloomberg.

In a SPAC, early investors buy units, which typically include a share of common stock and a fraction of a warrant, to buy more shares at a later date. They are considered a sweetener for lenders and have hitherto been considered as equity instruments for accounting purposes. Sponsor teams – the management of a SPAC – also typically receive warrants as part of their reward to find a deal, in addition to the founders’ shares.

In a statement late Monday, SEC officials urged those involved in SPACs to pay attention to the accounting implications of their transactions. They said a recent analysis of the market had shown a pattern of fact in transactions in which “warrants should be classified as a liability measured at fair value, with changes in fair value reported in profit each period.”

Source