Second autopsy finds cause of death of Andrea | News Extra

Kidnapping victim Andrea Bharatt was hit with a blunt object in the forehead, causing her to fall. The impact resulted in a skull fracture and internal bleeding.

So says activist Inshan Ishmael, who, along with two other people, paid for the costs of a private autopsy.

An autopsy conducted at the Forensic Science Center on Monday failed to determine how Bharatt died.

The second autopsy was performed by Professor Hubert Daisely at the Boodoo funeral home in Cunupia.

He said he wanted the thousands of people who supported Bharatt and her family to know the truth, and he revealed the autopsy findings in a live video on social media this afternoon.

He said, “As we promised yesterday, I was not satisfied with the unclear report we got from the pathologist yesterday in relation to something like this. In fact, I said yesterday that it is unlikely for me to get the report after just a few days. can’t give a definitive answer. “

The findings were revealed to Bharatt’s father before it was made public, he said.

Ishmael said, “I could tell you that Professor Daisley’s report is not unclear and he found the reason for her death. Andrea was hit on the forehead with something bone and what caused that fell back and broke her skull and caused that. “bleeding from the inside. The whole area of ​​the skull could be seen pinkish-reddish in color … She died of internal bleeding.”

Ishmael said the pathologist also found stab wounds on Bharatt’s arm. However, he said that Daisely could not say whether the wounds were caused in the initial autopsy.

Samples were taken to determine if Bharrat had been sexually assaulted.

He said an examination of the stomach indicated that Bharatt was not fed or ate in the hours before her death.

“This is not my child and I feel like I am going through trauma. I want Mr. Bharatt to know that we are right next to him and that he will support him in doing so,” he said.

The Express was told that both reports, the autopsy conducted by the state and private, would be admissible in this case.

.Source