Previously infected coronavirus ‘not fully protected against reinfection’, study warns

by

Young people who have previously been infected with the coronavirus will not be fully protected against reinfection, according to a new study.

Researchers at Mount Sinai’s Icahn School of Medicine analyzed data from more than 3,000 healthy members of the United States Marine Corps, ages 18 to 20.

They found that about 10 percent of those involved in the study who had previously been infected with Covid-19 had become reinfected.

The study authors cautioned that despite previous infection and the presence of antibodies, vaccination is still necessary to boost immune response, prevent reinfection, and reduce transmission.

They added that young people should take the vaccine whenever possible.

Young people who have been previously infected with the coronavirus will not be fully protected against reinfection, according to a new study

Young people who have previously been infected with the coronavirus will not be fully protected against reinfection, according to a new study

Humans “can be reinfected with Covid every two to four years” because the virus mutates into new variants

Mutant variants of the coronavirus can re-infect humans every two to four years, a top scientist warns.

Paul Hunter, a professor of medicine at the University of East Anglia, said it is normal for future tensions to emerge and they do not necessarily cause serious illness.

But he warned that “it is very difficult to predict” because “you never really know what each new variety will do.”

Government advisers are already finding that vaccines are less effective on existing variants, including as much as 30 percent less effective on the South African variant.

Highly communicable mutations first discovered in Kent and Brazil are referred to as ‘variants of concern’ and are also driving a third wave across Europe.

Professor Hunter stressed that many new variants are not a cause for concern, but should be monitored to ensure that the lockdown lifting roadmap does not derail.

According to the observational study conducted between May and November 2020, 19 of 189 Marines infected with Covid contracted the virus again.

This was compared with new infections in 50% (1,079 of 2,247) of the participants who had not previously been infected with the virus.

Although the study was conducted on young, fit, mostly male recruits, the researchers believe that the risk of reinfection will apply to many young people.

However, the exact rate of reinfection will not be applicable in other environments, due to the overcrowded living conditions on a military base.

The team said the close personal contact required for basic training would likely contribute to a higher overall infection rate than elsewhere.

For example, a study of four million people in Denmark found that the risk of infection was five times higher in people who had not had the disease before.

But researchers found that only 0.65% of those who had had Covid-19 on Denmark’s first wave tested positive again on the second wave, compared to 3.3% of people who tested positive after initially being negative. .

In addition, a preprint study with UK health professionals found that those who had not previously been infected were at a five times higher risk of being infected than those with a previous infection.

Professor Stuart Sealfon, senior author of the study, said it is important to remember that despite a previous infection, young people can contract the virus again.

“Immunity is not guaranteed by past infection, and vaccinations that provide additional protection are still necessary for those who have had Covid-19.”

Recruits who tested positive for a second infection during the study were isolated, and researchers followed additional tests.

Levels of neutralizing antibodies were also taken from later infected participants who were not reinfected during the study period.

Of the 2,346 participants who followed long enough for this analysis, 189 were HIV positive and 2,247 seronegative at study entry.

In both groups, there were 1098 (45%) new infections during the study and of the recruits who were seronegative, 1079 (48%) became infected.

The authors studied the antibody responses of infected and uninfected participants to understand why these reinfections occurred.

They found that among the HIV-positive group of participants who became reinfected, had lower antibody levels to the virus than those who did not.

When they compared new infections, they found that patients who had the virus before and were infected again had about 10 times less of the virus in their system than someone infected for the first time.

This suggests that some reinfected individuals could still transmit the virus, but the authors noted that this needs further investigation.

They found that about 10 percent of those involved in the study who had previously been infected with Covid-19 had become reinfected.

They found that about 10 percent of those involved in the study who had previously been infected with Covid-19 had become reinfected.

In the study, most of the new cases were asymptomatic – 84% (16 of 19 participants) in the seropositive group and 68% (732 of 1079) in the seronegative group – or had mild symptoms, and none were hospitalized .

The authors noted some limitations of the study, including that it likely underestimated the risk of reinfection in previously infected individuals.

This is because it does not take into account people with very low antibody levels after their past infection.

They were also unable to determine how HIV-positive recruits contracted their previous infection and confirm it with a PCR test or determine how severe it was and what symptoms they had.

They found that among the HIV-positive group, participants who became reinfected had lower antibody levels to the virus than those who did not

They found that among the HIV-positive group, participants who became reinfected had lower antibody levels to the virus than those who did not

Researchers said they could also have missed detectable infections that occurred between PCR tests every two weeks during the study, published in the journal The Lancet Respiratory Medicine.

“While antibodies induced by initial infection are largely protective, they do not guarantee effective SARS-CoV-2 neutralization activity or immunity to subsequent infection,” the study said.

A separate study published in March in The Lancet found that the majority of people who have had COVID-19 are protected from getting it again for at least six months, but older people are more prone to reinfection than younger people people.

Only 2 percent of the positive lateral flow results are correct, adviser Matt Hancock says in leaked emails after Boris Johnson urged the nation to take them twice a week.

Only two percent of positive Covid lateral flow test results, taken in areas of low prevalence, are correct, a consultant to Matt Hancock has warned.

In emails leaked to the Guardian, senior strategist Ben Dyson is said to have warned health department colleagues about the unreliability of the lateral flow test results.

Mr. Dyson, executive director of strategy in the health department and one of health secretary Matt Hancock’s advisers, has reportedly expressed fears that the reliability of positive results in certain areas could be as low as two percent.

The email was reportedly sent on April 9, four days after Boris Johnson announced a multi-billion-pound plan for a mass test drive in the UK – in which Britons would test themselves twice a week with lateral flow tests.

According to the Guardian, Mr. Dyson said in his email, “ As of today, someone who gets a positive LFD result in (say) London has a 25 percent chance at best that it’s really positive, but if it’s a self – reported test may be as low as 10 percent (on an optimistic assumption about specificity) or as low as 2 percent (on a more pessimistic assumption).

Source