“Have you heard about the Stanford University peer-reviewed study showing beyond a shadow of a doubt that face masks have absolutely no chance of preventing the spread of Covid-19? No? It was posted on the government website of the National Center for Biotechnological Information, ”NOQReport.com reported. “The NCBI is a branch of the National Institute for Health, so you would think such a study would be widely covered by the mainstream media and embraced by the ‘science-loving’ people in Big Tech.”
The study found, “The data suggests that both medical and non-medical face masks are ineffective in viral and infectious diseases such as SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19.”
Instead, it was revealed that no old media reported this. For some odd reason, older media seem to want to perpetuate the mask myth… as if they like to wear the cloth face mask.
In July 2020, the Globe purchased a fabric mask from a pharmacy in preparation for a flight. Here’s the warning on the box: “Antimicrobial face mask will not protect users from bacteria, viruses, germs or other pathogenic organisms.” (see photo above)
Just to prove it was a mask story, Twitter suspended former Trump adviser Steve Cortez when he did Tweeted from the study with his comments:
Twitter has been suspended @CortesSteve for citing a Stanford NIH study on masks. pic.twitter.com/2y460zkN0Z
– Raheem Kassam (@RaheemKassam) April 17, 2021
The Globe has been questioning since spring 2020 – more than a year ago – and reporting on the lack of masking skills. We spoke with nearly 20 epidemiologists, virologists, immunologists, various physicians, public health physicians and medical experts.
Here’s an article:
“According to immunologists and epidemiologists interviewed by California Globe, ordering people indoors, closing schools, wearing masks and distancing themselves from social contacts is the opposite of what needs to be done for the health and well-being of people. the society. Herd immunity is believed to be the real health goal while protecting the most vulnerable – in the case of coronavirus, the elderly and the sick are confined to nursing homes. “
The governor issued an executive order and had his public health department issue a new directive on Thursday, which stated:
“Over the past four months we have learned a lot about COVID-19 transmission, especially that people who are infected but are asymptomatic or presymptomatic play an important role in the dissemination of the community. The use of face covers by anyone can limit the release of infected droplets when talking, coughing and / or sneezing and can also increase physical distance. “
What was once a guideline for flattening the curve has changed to “people who are infected but are asymptomatic or presymptomatic play an important role in the spread of the community. “
And in another article:
California Globe reported that Dr. Jeffrey Klausner, a professor of medicine and public health at the University of California, Los Angeles said:
“I don’t think there is any evidence that wearing a surgical mask is of any benefit in generally protecting someone from exposure or contamination. We usually recommend that people who are ill wear surgical masks to prevent transmission [to others]… It may be some sort of awareness-raising tool, but in terms of the immediate benefits, there is no data, ”added Dr. Klausner adds.
Dr. Brosseau and and Dr. Sietsema, both national respiratory protection and infectious disease experts at the University of Illinois at Chicago, said wear cloths or surgical masks because, there is no scientific evidence that they are effective in reducing the risk of SARS-CoV- 2 transfer. “
Found another Globe article:
“The Center for Disease Control conducted a pooling analysis of 10 RCTs that examined the impact of face masks on reducing influenza infections within a community,” California Globe reported in “Why I’m Not Wearing a Mask.” They concluded that these studies “found no significant reduction in flu transmission with the use of face masks. “These studies covered a wide variety of environmental factors, from college dormitories to households, but the results were the same for all.”
“There is limited evidence for them [masks] effectiveness in preventing influenza virus transmission, ‘they found. This was true for masks “worn by the infected person for source control OR when worn by uninfected persons.” They unequivocally concluded that there was “no significant effect of face masks on the transmission of laboratory-confirmed influenza.” ”
An April 2020 Globe article reported:
The COVID-19 virus is mainly transmitted between humans via breathing drops – sneezes and coughs.
Droplet transfer occurs when a person is in close contact with someone who has respiratory symptoms and coughs or sneezes. The respiratory drops can then be transferred through the mouth and nose, or eyes, if exposed to potentially infectious respiratory droplets.
This is why many medical experts say masks will not prevent exposure to COVID-19, because to actually wear enough equipment to prevent exposure, you must wear goggles to protect your eyes and a mask that protects the nose and mouth. covered. And it’s still a big maybe.
As one doctor said half jokingly, “If cloth underwear cannot prevent a fart from escaping, how can a cloth mask protect against an infectious virus?” While he was funny, his point was that cloth masks are ineffective and not used in hospitals.
The Stanford study said, “Wearing a face mask mechanically restricts breathing through the resistance to air movement during both inhalation and exhalationcess[12,13]. Long-term and continuous effect of wearing face mask can be harmful to health. “
And the Stanford study found that the psychological effects of wearing a face mask are quite negative, as shown in Table 1.
“Follow science” has new meaning.
Be sure to re-read “The Miserable Pseudo-Science Behind Face Masks, Social Distancing And Contact Tracing,” a June 2020 article in Globe.
