The controversy continues over the statements of Ramiro Rocca on his departure from MunicipalThe Argentinian attacker He said he had not received the proposal in the past month and that the leadership’s proposal Red it was much lower than that of Real España, where he eventually signed, and that of other clubs who wanted to stay with him.
About this, Selvyn Ponciano He came out to answer the South American striker and clarified the situation regarding the lack of payment: ‘We don’t pay him in January from what he says. We have always said, and this is how we work with all players, is that we pay 10 installments in the season “
And he explained where the misunderstanding with Ramiro Rocca about not receiving his salary in January came from: “Five quotas in the Apertura tournament and five in the Clausura. When the tournament was extended, he wanted to be paid at least an extra month, but he received his five installments, as stated in the contract “
Following the clarification, the branch president took the opportunity to criticize the attacker and his performance in the final stage of the Apertura 2020: “For me it has not achieved the overall goal. What he did individually is respected, but what ultimately weighs and seeks is winning a tournament “
What seemed like a good start for Rocca eventually turned into a big controversy between the player and the managers. To this we must add that the fans are very angry with the Argentinian and assure that since it was announced that he was going to Real Spain, he Red