Fast food restaurant chain Subway will have to explain to a California court the composition of one of its famous sandwiches after two residents sued that the tuna that they actually use as an ingredient it is not a fish, according to EFE.
In their complaint they claim that what Subway advertises as “tuna” is in fact “a mix of different concoctions which are not tuna and which are mixed to mimic their appearance. “
One such claim, which the company has categorically denied, was made after running “laboratory tests that found no tuna residue in the samples,” trying to determine what the substance was made from, the prosecutor said.
The lawsuit was filed in a California court last week, but came to light after the Washington Post reported it.
Following the uproar caused by the news, as Subway is a very popular chain in the United States with a presence in other countries, a company spokesperson described the allegations as “unfounded”.
“Just there is no truth in the allegations of the complaint filed in California. Subway supplies 100% cooked tuna to its restaurants, which is mixed with mayonnaise and used in the fresh sandwiches, wraps and salads that our customers enjoy, ”the company said in a statement.
In addition, the company believed that the complaint will negatively impact the sandwich chain’s franchise stores and the small owners of each business.
It may interest you
However, the attorney who filed the lawsuit, Alex Brown, insists that no one responsible for Subway specified the composition of the ingredient when they were contacted asking “what they were selling,” on find no traces of “tuna or fish protein. “
It is not the first time that a Subway ingredient has been called into question, as in October the Irish Supreme Court ruled that the bread on its menus could not be considered “technical bread” due to its high sugar content.