Meghan Markle disappears from her son Archie’s birth certificate

Meghan Markle has alleged that Buckingham Palace “dictated” that their first names be removed from Archie’s birth certificate. On Saturday, January 30, it was revealed that the names “Rachel Meghan” had been removed from the mother portion of Archie’s birth certificate, leaving him as “Her Royal Highness the Duchess of Sussex”.. Archie’s birth was registered on May 17, 2019, after he was born on May 6.

Now, a Meghan spokesperson has stated that “the name change in public documents in 2019 was dictated by the palace,” and also claimed it was “insulting” to suggest that she wanted to be “anonymous” at birth. certificate from his son. It is not yet clear why exactly the birth certificate has been changed.

The spokesman told the Telegraph: “The name change in public documents in 2019 was prompted by El Palacio, as confirmed by documents from senior Palace officials. This was not requested by Meghan, the Duchess of Sussex or the Duke of Sussex.

Meghan Markle and Prince Harry have moved to America

The change sparked speculation, with former Queen Press Secretary Dickie Arbiter saying, “Maybe this was the first part of her plan.” Lady Colin Campbell, who saw the amendment, said, “It is extraordinary and raises all kinds of questions about what the Sussexes thought.” Months after the name change, the couple had left the royal family.

It was previously revealed that it is “unlikely” that the Duchess of Sussex will accompany her husband when he returns to the UK in mid-2021. It is almost certain that the sixth in line to the throne will travel alone to see his family. for the first time since the couple bitterly stepped down as royalty, multiple sources told the Daily Mail.

Insiders insist that the couple’s plans are not yet complete and that much depends on the pandemic and whether any travel restrictions are in place at the time. But he understands at this point that Harry will be flying to the UK to see the Queen, Prince Charles and Prince William, along with their niece and nephews, without Meghan and probably their son Archie. Sources claimed that Meghan’s preliminary decision not to accompany her husband is for “personal and practical” reasons and cannot be construed as “contempt” in any way.

Read more about this topic

.Source