Indian Court Destroys Amazon’s Future Retail Sales Block to Reliance

An Indian court destroyed an order on Monday that would have prevented Reliance Industries – a major Amazon (AMZN) rival – from buying Future Retail.

The Delhi Supreme Court only ruled last week that the sale of $ 3.3 billion of Future Retail should be delayed. While the court noted that its verdict was not final, it said that ‘immediate orders’ were needed to protect Amazon’s rights, and ordered all parties involved in the deal to ‘enforce’ [the] status quo “while deliberating.

This week, however, another bank ruled in the same court that there was no need to cancel the deal after Future Group appealed. The judge has yet to pronounce the final warrant, but for now, Future Retail and Reliance Industries have the upper hand.

Shares of Future Retail are up 10% on Tuesday.

Amazon has the court block a $ 3.3 billion retail deal involving India's richest man
The ruling is the latest development in what appears to be a proxy battle between two of the world’s richest men for India’s burgeoning online shopping market. What is at stake is strategic access to a network of popular supermarkets and other retailers in India, something both Amazon and Jeff Bezos’s Reliance – owned by India’s richest man Mukesh Ambani – want to either have for themselves or prevent the other buys something. .

The core of the battle is Future Retail, the cash cow of the Indian conglomerate Future Group. The retail unit includes brands such as Big Bazaar, a popular supermarket chain.

Amazon and Walmart both dominate India’s e-commerce sector. But Ambani has ambitions to challenge that with JioMart, its online grocery platform that is expected to branch out into everything from electronics and apparel to pharmaceuticals and healthcare.

In August 2019, Amazon invested in a Future Group entity which, according to filings on September 30 last year, gave it an approximately 4.8% stake in Future Retail. The deal gave Amazon the right of first refusal to acquire more shares in Future Retail, according to one of the filings.

Amazon argued that the 2019 deal between the company and the Future Group entity included a non-compete clause, a person familiar with Amazon’s thinking told CNN Business in October. The clause listed 30 limited parties that Future Retail and Future Group could not do business with, and Reliance was on that list, the person said.

People who left a Big Bazaar store in Mumbai in November.  Future Retail owns the popular supermarket chain.
Amazon tried to enforce that agreement through the Singapore International Arbitration Center (SIAC), with the Southeast Asian country often seen as a neutral jurisdiction to settle disputes. The SIAC emergency arbitrator ordered a temporary halt to the deal last October.
While Future Group had questioned the validity of the arbitrator’s order in Singapore in India, the Delhi Supreme Court last week declared the order “enforceable” and suspended the deal.

While the latest move keeps the deal going on Monday, the battle is far from over. The Delhi Supreme Court has yet to make its final decision, which could once again jeopardize Reliance’s and Future’s plans, said Bharat Chugh, a Supreme Court attorney specializing in arbitration law.

Ultimately, the country’s Supreme Court could hear the case should both sides appeal. Future Retail, Reliance and Amazon did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

– CNNs Rishi Iyengar contributed to this report.

.Source