Fernando Guerrero’s decision on a sanction in favor of America sparked controversy in social networks
At minute 40, the referee Fernando Guerrero ran to the VAR to check if a sweep by Roberto Alvarado on Álvaro Fidalgo was criminalThe center-back decided yes, so the Eagles took the lead thanks to that decision and the controversy immediately started.
The arbitration analyst of ESPN Felipe Ramos Rizos thought Fernando Guerrero’s decision was correct, because he had first indicated there was no fault and then pulled out thanks to the VAR.
He will impose a criminal sanction in favor of America. If there is a defect, ”the whistler assured on his social networks, while Fernando Guerrero discussed the action in the Azteca stadium.
Emanuel Aguilera once scored the commentator’s 1-0 thanks to the penalty ESPN David Faitelson called the decision a “gift” to the Eagles
“” Gift “for America … Let’s hope the game improves …”, the journalist published ESPN. “A not very memorable game and a penalty kick full of controversy … Cruz Azul-América, so far a disappointment …” he added in one of his other comments.
Along with the publications of David Faitelson and Felipe Ramos Rizo, the word “ criminal ” became a trend in social networks as some fans felt there was no fault with Álvaro Fidalgo, while others claimed he shot him in the area.
With that action, Aguilera took the opportunity to score 1-0, the only goal of the game until half time. America is trying to end Cruz Azul’s streak of 12 consecutive wins, while Santiago Solari’s go for the eighth consecutive win in the Argentinian’s first tournament at the helm of Azulcremas.
Cruz Azul added six away games without conceding, a sign that ended against the Águilas at the Azteca Stadium, due to a penalty kick scored thanks to the VAR.