BofA split as bankers cry over special bonus treatment

Photographer: Scott Eells / Bloomberg

Anger increases in the higher ranks Bank of America Corp. after the company abandoned an unpopular new bonus policy for top traders and dealmakers, while retaining the plan for other employees.

It is an award of company stock that high earners – usually those making $ 1 million or more – first received as part of their 2020 compensation. Rather than vest in equal parts over a period of time, as is customary with such awards, these bonuses have a “cliff vest” provision that prevents the stock from being eligible for sale until after four years.

People familiar with the situation described an internal drama that unfolded in recent weeks.

Initially, the bank intended to apply the new remuneration structure widely. But investment banking and trading veterans rebelled when they learned they would have to stay until 2024 to rake in bonuses for 2020, and management agreed to exempt them.

Chief Executive Officer Brian Moynihan acknowledged the backlash in a Jan. 27 interview on Bloomberg Television, saying the policy change “didn’t work the way some people wanted, so we fixed it.”

House Financial Services Committee hearing on holding megabanks accountable

Brian Moynihan, CEO of Bank of America Corp.

Photographer: Andrew Harrer / Bloomberg

Yet senior colleagues in corporate and commercial banking, a less powerful cohort, soon found out that their rewards are still subject to vesting restrictions. Then the grunting started, the people said. In recent days, employees have gathered to express frustration and discuss options.

The decision struck a raw nerve. Bank of America is torn by long-standing jealousy and division among its more than 200,000 employees, many of which date back to the shotgun marriage to Merrill Lynch in the 2008 financial crisis. An unequal approach to compensation risks exacerbating these tensions at a time when most of the business works from home and collaboration is costly.

.Source