Mexico City
Arturo Brizio, chairman of the Referee Commission, recognized that Marco Antonio Ortiz made a mistake in the match between Atlético de Saint Louis Y Cougars, a game that was very controversial after they were three goals nullified for the potosino team
The exsilbante said the blunder occurred on the first nullified goal, in an action in which Nicolas Ibáñez he hit the ball well Alfredo Talavera, but highlighting the Argentinian forward’s mistake.
The Pumas goalkeeper cannot keep the ball, which is won by the attacker who scores the goal. The referee penalizes a violation, the VAR should have proposed the on-court assessment and the referee has rectified his decision. The Law states that the goalkeeper cannot be challenged for the ball in his possession, in this case the goalkeeper of Pumas never had control of the ballBrizio explained in his analysis of each day.
Regarding the canceled goals against Juan Izquierdo and another against Ibañez, he pointed out that there were arguments not to count in addition to the fact that the penalty against the college team still had bases.
How much penalty do the last 3 positions pay?
Since March 2020, it was announced that the last three sites are in the percentage table would pay a total of 240 million pesos since there is no drop, 120 of which are positioned for the worst, 70 for the penultimate and 50 for the penultimate.
For now, Atlético de San Luis is in position 17 still with the option of avoiding the fine thanks to the volatile percentage for the four tournaments being counted.