
Raphael Warnock, center, and Jon Ossoff attend a meeting in Garden City, Georgia on December 19.
Photographer: Colin Douglas Gray / Bloomberg
Photographer: Colin Douglas Gray / Bloomberg
Investors are not quite ready to leave this chaotic year behind. There is one more lingering risk event to worry about: the final races of the 2020 election taking place next year.
While not as pronounced as the hedging seen around election day last month, options and volatility futures indicate heightened concerns about possible market turbulence as a result of the results of the January 5 runoff races in Georgia, which will determine whether Republicans take control of keep the Senate.
Ahead of the November vote, many viewed a Democratic sweep of the election as one of the most optimistic results for US stocks. Since then, however, the market has shown that it is comfortable with a possible ongoing division over the government – a backdrop that has historically delivered strong returns.
“There is no doubt that if you go from red to blue, you have to price something that looks less favorable because markets like stalemate, markets that appreciate the status quo,” said Phil Camporeale, CEO of multi-asset solutions for JPMorgan Asset Management.
The focus on the outflow – and the demand for hedges to protect against turbulence in the aftermath – is on uncertainty about exactly how investors should position themselves for a Joe Biden presidency. He needs senate democratic scrutiny to enact an agenda that would boost green energy companies at the expense of fossil fuel producers, likely leading to more economic aid packages and infrastructure spending. But it could also help him raise the corporate tax rate and strengthen regulatory oversight.
“It is impossible to exaggerate how important these elections are to the size, scale and speed of fiscal, fiscal and regulatory policies in 2021,” Cowen analyst Chris Krueger wrote in a December 21 note.
Hedges in place
There are potential winners and losers in both scenarios and the question is which longer term scenario would be a better scenario for the general stock market. But traders seem to be hedging against volatility that could erupt in the near term if the Georgian results lead investors to pile on to the outcome’s supposed beneficiaries and dump the alleged losers.
The hedge likely also reflects concerns that even small surprises could create turbulence in a stock market that needs the general public to keep investing after a spectacular run. The S&P 500 is up 65% from its March low, with an assortment of valuation metrics at their highest in a decade or more.
“The idea that tax policy and government purchasing could be more important than revenue and revenue – is a lot like 2020, isn’t it? – is instinctively uncomfortable and supports a persistent above-normal volatility, ”wrote Julian Emanual, equity strategist at brokerage BTIG, in a recent note.
Biden stocks will have history and fed on the side, not much else
The run-offs in Georgia were triggered after no candidate for the state’s two Senate seats secured the majority of the vote. Republican David Perdue is running for re-election against Jon Ossoff, while Senator Kelly Loeffler takes on Democrat Raphael Warnock. Polls show that there is a fierce battle between the Republican and Democratic contenders, while the PredictIt betting market shows a slight advantage for the Republicans. President Donald Trump’s last-minute demand for larger payments to Americans as part of a Covid-19 aid package is also a wildcard that could affect the vote.
The proximity to the races has left investors unsure of what to expect in the first part of a Biden administration. If the Democrats win both races, it puts them in control of the Senate with the help of a tie from Vice President-elect Kamala Harris. (Two independent senators are working with the Democrats.)
“We see both elections as too close,” said Tom Hainlin, strategist at US Bank Wealth Management’s Ascent Private Wealth Group, adding that “some market volatility is possible in the short term” following the vote if Democrats take both seats. .
Evercore ISI strategists say the Cboe Volatility Index futures curve remains “remarkably steep” as a result of the events in Georgia, similar to the situation during the November races.

The VIX futures curve on December 23
Meanwhile, the skew in S&P 500’s one-month wells, or a measure of costs in the bearish options, was at the 92nd percentile of a historical range, according to data collected by Nomura Securities. “The focus is on protection after a hellish run, and ahead of the macro regime change risk of the impending Georgia Senate run-off,” Charlie McElligott, a cross-asset strategist at Nomura, wrote in a recent report. note to customers.
Many in the market are assuming that the Republican candidates will keep both seats, said Ryan Detrick, chief market strategist for LPL Financial, so surprises “could disrupt the apple cart.”
Angry things
LPL research has found that a divided congress has historically benefited the stock market – over the past seven decades, the S&P 500 returned an average of 17.2% per year when the flow was split between the two parties. That’s comparable to a 10.7% advance when the Democrats were in charge and 13.4% with Republicans at the helm of both chambers.

Activity is too heating up in the Treasury options market, marked by a contrary bet that emerged late Monday. The bet was against the potential of aggressive fiscal stimulus to spur a long-end bond market defeat, and it appears to be paying off as an increase in interest rates for about the next month around 10 basis points versus the current levels is capped. bet is leaning against a theme gaining momentum in Treasury options – that the sell-off in Georgia could trigger a sharp sell-off in Treasuries.
Treasury Options Market comes to life as Georgia approaches Runoffs
Sure, many on Wall Street don’t see Georgia races as too big a game changer. According to Art Hogan, chief market strategist at National Securities Corp., a small majority of Democrats in the Senate does not necessarily imply an immediate introduction of new policies, including a review of tax rates.
“I just don’t think it plays into this idea of, ‘Oh my god, immediately higher corporate taxes and big changes.’ I think it’s much more of a centrist mindset that we’re going to have some gradual changes, ”Hogan said over the phone.“ The market story also changed pretty quickly after the election, saying, ‘Hey, wait a minute, we’ve got the blue wave, but we have a new president and with that probably comes a calmer presence around international relations and tariffs and trade and more standardization. ‘I think the market has established itself in that concept. “
– With the help of Lu Wang and Sarah Ponczek