The latest corruption scandals involving civil servants and family members of Danilo Medina fall short, given the many suspicions and great evidence from various national sectors of abuse and unforgivable violations that had taken place in the government that had just been removed from power. Not only the irresponsible burden of debt and the frontal commitment to institutionality, it was also an open secret that from the head and the various branches of the purple government there was a frank division with the ethical-moral, with the Boschist principles that gave rise to the PLD and even with national interests. Therefore, the state and public funds were viewed as a piñata, without knowing – or not wanting to know (?) – that there is no valid excuse for a brother or brother-in-law of the current governor to be an official supplier and their companies are given contracts however big they may be based on the fact that “they were businessmen”, because besides the required delicacy and caution it is strictly prohibited. Such as the immigration and nationality issue (judgment TC-168-13), despite the fact that it was preferred to view the border as a business and as a supply, illegally granting nationality by decree to 750 undocumented immigrants from the neighboring country (¿). With leadership that is questioned and rejected, with many people involved or engaged in matters of legal merit, the future and direction of the PLD – if any – look very uncertain. Who sticks his head, who shows his face? … And if someone dares to do one or the other, with what moral authority? We cannot speak of prophylaxis or renewal, none of that is valid at the moment, because the damage and wear have been very great. For this reason, knowing that the package must be hidden, someone said that “we must remove the PLD from the corruption charges” and go to those responsible. Another said the PLD should “go back to Bosch” (?). The first does not fit, because the leadership (CP and NATO) were the bosses, the party and officials. And the other less, because to speak of ‘going back to Bosch’ would be an insult. Simple: because they left their postulates and betray him. No wonder the poet Tony Raful sees an “empty” PLD as “a skeleton without Boschistic ideological foundations” because “those who left took away the spirit and the mysticism.” For him “the end is near”. Then, on her 47th anniversary of its founding, which she did not celebrate, the PLD and the authors of the widespread damage and deception – in an act of remorse – had to take the opportunity to issue a reflective document outlining the country forgiveness was asked. Another mistake. [email protected]